{"id":1927,"date":"2021-08-02T18:45:04","date_gmt":"2021-08-02T18:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/?post_type=sub-practice-areas&#038;p=1927"},"modified":"2021-12-10T16:50:53","modified_gmt":"2021-12-10T16:50:53","slug":"glascow-coma-scale-2","status":"publish","type":"sub-practice-areas","link":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/glascow-coma-scale-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Limitations of the Glascow Coma Scale Scores"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Glascow Coma Scale is a tool used to describe the level of consciousness of a person following a head injury.&nbsp; It relies upon an examiner, EMS personnel, emergency room physician, nurse, neurologist or other trained professional to assess the patient\u2019s response to three stimuli:&nbsp; Eye response, motor response and verbal response.&nbsp; The scores from each of these categories total a sum between 3 and 15, with 15 representing the highest level of consciousness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although it has become a useful tool for triage in pre hospital patients and for assessing patients with ongoing issues, the scale only measures the response of a patient at a snapshot in time.&nbsp; Thus, if a first responder arrives to an accident scene 30 minutes after a trauma, the GCS taken at that time provides no information as to the patient\u2019s level of consciousness immediately after the accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Moreover, the GCS has been shown to have limitations due to the interrater reliability of the score takers.&nbsp; Studies have shown a variation in score assessment for the same patient depending upon the training and skill level of the healthcare provider who is assessing the patient.&nbsp; For instance, in one study, experienced nurses were more consistent with GCS scoring than less experienced nurses and nursing students.&nbsp; These studies suggest that accuracy and reliability of scoring is dependent on tester experience with the GCS score.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another potential issue with the GCS is the collection of valid scores.&nbsp; For example, the verbal response can be hindered by the presence of hearing loss, psychiatric disorders, dementia, developmentaldelay or injuries to the mouth or throat.&nbsp; Language barriers can also present a challenge to the accurate collection and scoring of data in all categories.&nbsp; The motor response is also vunerable to complicating factors such as spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve injury.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, medical literature widely reports that the GCS is a poor predictor of functional outcome in neurologically impaired patients post-traumatic injury.&nbsp; In other words, patients with scores of 15 at the time of testing do not all recover from their traumatic brain injury in terms of the functional outcome.&nbsp; Thus, the GCS was not designed for and should not be used as a predictor of patient outcomes post-traumatic injury.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1926,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":301,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[{"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_type":"none"}],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[]},"categories":[76],"class_list":["post-1927","sub-practice-areas","type-sub-practice-areas","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-glascow-coma-scale"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sub-practice-areas\/1927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sub-practice-areas"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/sub-practice-areas"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cochranfirm.com\/new-orleans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}