The Cochran Firm Legal Blog
Monday, February 8, 2010
Avandia, Actos, and Heart Attacks
Avandia and Actos are both drugs for treating type 2 (adult onset) diabetes. Avandia is offered by the British company GlaxoSmithKline and Actos is offered by Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. with Eli Lilly & Co. They have both been found to increase the risk of heart failure and in 2007, the FDA required them to have a black box warning to that effect. A black box warning is the strongest FDA warning.
They belong to a class of diabetes drugs (called thiazolidinediones or glitazones) that work by increasing the body’s sensitivity to insulin. Another drug in this class was Rezulin, which was withdrawn from the market in 2000 for causing liver disease fatalities.
In 2007, The Avandia and Actos companies separately issued warnings that their drugs can also increase the risk of broken bones in women.
A Harvard Study
The American Diabetes Association is planning to publish a study done recently by a group of Harvard researchers. The study covered the years from 2000 to 2006 and focused on the medical records of 26,375 diabetic patients who took Avandia. They were all patients at Boston area clinics and hospitals affiliated with Harvard Medical School.
The study compared this group with another group in the same time period who took Actos. Researchers were looking for reports of heart attack (myocardial infarction) and they found such reports nearly twice as often for patients on Avandia as for those on Actos.
Separate and Similar Studies
- In a separate study done by GlaxoSmithKline and i3 Drug Safety (a drug safety firm), researchers found that the risk of heart attack among Avandia users is increased by 35 percent to 41 percent over that for Actos users. This study used the medical records of 47,501 patients for each of the two drugs and covered the years 2000 to 2007. It will be published in the journal Clinical Therapeutics shortly.
- In 2003, the Mayo Clinic published the results of their Actos and Avandia study. This was a much smaller study but it involved live patients. The six patients had type 2 diabetes and took either Actos or Avandia. They all went to an emergency room complaining of congestive heart failure symptoms (shortness of breath, weight gain, swollen feet) and four of them also had chronic kidney trouble.
About 13,000 people have filed claims against GlaxoSmithKline after using Avandia and suffering a heart attack. An unknown number have also filed against Eli Lilly and Takeda. However, the FDA has so far refused to order these drugs withdrawn from the market.
If you have been harmed by a defective drug and are wondering whether you might have a valid legal claim against the drug manufacturer, please contact our law firm today. Our lawyers work out of offices nationwide and we will be happy to schedule a free case review for you.
Labels: main
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 12:13 PM
Friday, February 5, 2010
Harvard Study Confirms Avandia’s Risk of Heart Attacks
A group of Harvard researchers recently released a study to be published by the American Diabetes Association that lends support to the mounting allegations against the drug Avandia. The study, which analyzed clinical care data from 26,375 diabetes patients between 2000 and 2006, found that diabetic patients taking Avandia suffered more than twice as many heart attacks as patients taking other diabetes medications.
This figure is higher than the study sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, the pharmaceutical company that produces Avandia. The GlaxoSmithKline study revealed that Avandia users have a 35-41% greater likelihood of suffering a heart attack compared with users of other diabetes medications.
The Harvard study provides compelling evidence that taking Avandia does in fact place a patient at a greater risk for heart attacks. Yet surprisingly, Avandia has not been taken off the market.
More than 13,000 Avandia users have filed pharmaceutical injury lawsuits against the company after suffering heart attacks and other serious injuries caused by taking the dangerous drug. The lawsuits claim that GlaxoSmithKline failed to adequately warn patients of the increased risk of heart attack, heart failure, and stroke.
If you have suffered a serious injury as a result of taking Avandia, the defective drug lawyers at The Cochran Firm can help you receive the compensation you deserve. Please contact us today to schedule your free initial consultation. The Cochran Firm serves clients nationwide.
Labels: main
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 10:02 AM
Thursday, February 4, 2010
2010 Toyota Prius Added to Defective Auto List
Earlier this week, Toyota announced that over seven million vehicles were affected by the defective gas pedal situation. Now, the auto company has announced that the 2010 Prius has problems of its own. Rather than the gas pedal, the Prius has problems with its antilock braking system. Consumers report trouble braking on uneven or slick surfaces, even at low speed, which increases the likelihood of an accident. So far, no one has reported an accident due to brake malfunctions.
The Prius, touted as the flagship vehicle for Toyota, has a waiting list of interested consumers for the green technology and advanced engineering. The Prius, according to an auto industry analyst and Prius owner, should be the company's "gold standard;" the vehicle that will probably one of the top vehicles purchased globally into the foreseeable future. However, it has joined Toyota's other models in the defective automobile category until this problem can be cleared up.
The Prius brake problem is not part of the mounting problem with the gas pedal. While that defective part was manufactured in the US, the brake pedal for the Prius is manufactured in Japan. As of this writing, there are less than 150 reported problems with the brakes.
There are virtually no reports of trouble with the brakes on 2004-2009 Prius models. One reason may be because the 2010 Prius has a new kind of regenerative brake system. Regenerative braking uses energy from the wheels to recharge the vehicle's battery. Hybrid vehicles, including the Prius, use a variety of electronic systems that combine conventional brake pads with regenerative braking, but stopping the vehicle uses brake pads more than the regenerative system.
The braking problem with the Prius, as well as the gas pedal problem on eight other models put Toyota in a position where it must defend its safety record, once one of the safest records around.
If you or a loved one has been injured in an auto accident due to a defective part, please contact the experienced personal injury attorneys at the Cochran Firm. We serve clients nationwide.
Labels: main
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 7:38 AM
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
NTSB Reports Pilot Error to Blame for Fatal Commuter Airplane Accident
In a rare blunt assessment, the National Transportation Safety Board said the pilot was to blame for the crash of Continental Connection Flight 3407 on February 12 of last year, killing 50 people, including one on the ground. Investigators said that the pilot responded "with startle and confusion," wasting crucial seconds before acting. Then, when the pilot acted, he acted inappropriately, worsening the situation and dooming the plane. In addition, the copilot did not either call out the situation to alert the pilot to appropriate action or perform appropriate action to override the pilot to prevent the aviation accident.
Investigators agreed that the crash of Flight 3407, owned and operated by Colgan Air, Inc., was caused by a stall, and to correct a stall the pilot should have pushed the control column forward, while calling out "stall," but instead he pulled back. The copilot also did not call out the stall, and she did not push the control column forward, overriding the pilot. Investigators say the pilot had 27 seconds between when the stall warning occurred and the plane's recorders stopped, probably on impact.
Investigators said that the pilot and copilot were too casual and relaxed about the flight, and maintained a constant stream of dialogue, in violation of aviation's general consensus on a "sterile cockpit" where conversation is kept to a minimum. One of the investigators said, "It was as if the flight was just a means for the captain to conduct a conversation with this young first officer." Investigators blamed this constant conversation for reducing the awareness of the pilots to the plane's situation. The conversation made them slow to respond and led them to squander vital seconds before responding to the situation.
In addition, it was revealed that the pilot had previously had problems with the exact situation that led to the crash of Flight 3407. Before joining Colgan, the pilot had failed three pilot tests, although he only disclosed one on his application. In addition, he had failed two similar tests during his career at Colgan. His performance on these failed tests indicated that he had trouble with landing stalls, the situation that occurred and led to the crash of Flight 3407. Colgan argues that because the pilot concealed two failed tests on his application, they did not have sufficient prior knowledge of the pilot's poor performance. Three failed flight tests seem sufficient rationale for a pilot to be removed from rotation for retraining until he can pass a test.
People who lost loved ones in the crash of Flight 3407 say that the Federal Aviation Administration maintains two separate standards of safety: one for the major carriers, and another for regional carriers, who carry as much as 25% of all passengers in the United States. They say that regional airlines like Colgan should not be allowed to operate as wildcatters, skirting safety rules to cut corners and costs to improve profits.
NTSB board members expressed concern about "bottom feeders" in the airline industry that do not actually adopt the safety protocols. Instead announcing an intent to adopt protocols, file plans, and have a good safety plan in principal or on paper, but never actually implemented. Small carriers balk at the expense of safety equipment, since it diminishes their profits to equip many small planes.
If you lost a loved one in this or another airline accident, your wrongful death lawsuit can help draw attention to the full costs of violating safety protocols. The Cochran Firm stands ready to represent you in action against all those who could have and should have done something to prevent the accident. Please contact us today for a free initial consultation.
Labels: main
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 2:02 PM
Automobile Accidents at Intersections in San Jose, California
Typically, automobile accidents at intersections involve left-turning vehicles that are attempting to cross on-coming traffic, the failure to yield the right of way or the failure to obey stop signs or traffic lights. Failure to yield the right of way, driving through a stop sign or ignoring a traffic signal at an intersection is responsible for almost 45% of all fatal automobile accidents.
Obscured stop signs, faded or missing stop signs and malfunctioning traffic lights, along with faulty intersection design are responsible for motor vehicle accidents at intersections also. The experienced California automobile accident attorneys at The Cochran Firm have road design engineers, accident investigators and experts in many fields available to assist in the determination of possible negligence on the part of municipalities for an accident at an intersection.
Automobile accidents at intersections often result in devastating injuries like traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, severed limbs, broken bones and massive soft tissue trauma. You should be financially compensated for any expenses caused by someone else’s negligence due to your injuries, such as medical and long term care expenses, the loss of income, your pain and suffering, and in the case of a wrongful death, the survivors are entitled to damages for their losses also.
If you or someone you love was injured or killed at a dangerous intersection in the San Jose, California area, please contact The Cochran Firm today to schedule a private consultation at no cost to you to protect your legal rights and to learn how to proceed with your case.
Labels: San Jose
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 11:50 AM
Rear End Car Collisions in Memphis, Tennessee
Rear end car collisions have become the most common type of car accident since the introduction of the cell phone, with over 2.5 million rear end collisions every year in the United States.
A rear end car collision often results in serious physical injury to the occupants of the automobile that is struck due to an injury commonly known as whiplash. Whiplash is the result of a sudden, violent involuntary forward and backward motion of the head and neck, which causes soft tissue trauma to the muscles and ligaments of the neck that results in pain, swelling, stiffness, headache, nausea, numbness and loss of balance.
Whiplash injuries can range from mild symptoms to severe, life-changing disabling pain. If left untreated, this condition can be responsible for months and years of debilitating pain and suffering.
The experienced rear end car collision attorneys at The Cochran Firm work together as a team so clients can benefit from the level of skill and knowledge available to them. If you have suffered because of someone else's negligence and inattention, you deserve to be compensated for your injuries.
If you live in the Memphis, Tennessee area, please contact The Cochran Firm today if you or someone you love was injured in a rear end car collision to protect your legal rights and get the financial compensation you deserve from the law firm that cares.
Labels: Memphis
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 11:09 AM
Truck Accidents in Dothan, Alabama
Every day commuting back and forth to work or driving to a doctor's appointment, grocery shopping or dropping your children off at school is stressful enough, but when you add the danger inherent in a tired truck driver speeding to meet a deadline in an overloaded, poorly maintained, 40 ton truck in the lane next to you, the stress level rises to new heights.
If you are ever involved in an accident with a truck, protect your rights by gathering as much information about the accident as possible, and notify your own insurance company without delay; a delay in notifying your own insurance company may affect your claim. Do not allow the trucking company or insurance adjuster to choose your physician; you have the absolute right to choose your own doctor, and do not sign anything without the advice of your own legal representative.
Trucking companies have teams of lawyers and insurance adjusters on the payroll whose main goal is to protect the trucking company in the event of an accident and limit their financial and legal responsibility.
If you have been injured in an Alabama truck accident you can benefit from the experience of the truck accident attorneys at The Cochran Firm who will be aggressive in protecting your legal right, and willing to do everything they can to give you the legal representation and personal attention you deserve.
If you live in the Dothan, Alabama area, and you or a loved one has been the victim of an accident with a truck, please contact The Cochran Firm today and learn how we can help you recover financial compensation for your injuries and losses without delay.
Labels: Dothan
posted by Benjamin A. Irwin at 10:41 AM

